Thursday, June 04, 2015

How the church best influences the culture


Today, I was reminded of Martin Lloyd-Jones and his commentary on Ephesians 5:18-6:9. Remember, he lived in the mid-20th Century. Communism was a real foe and a great concern. In a chapter of his book, Life in the Spirit entitled “The Christian’s Priorities,” he wrote:

“The business of the church is not to deal with political or social or economic conditions as such… The church’s task primarily is to evangelize, and to bring people to a knowledge of God. Then, having done that, she is to teach them how to live this life under God as His people. The church is not here to reform the world, for the world cannot be reformed. The business of the church is to evangelize, to preach the Gospel of salvation to me who are blinded by sin and under the domination and the power of the devil. The moment the church begins to enter into the details of politics and economics, she is doing something that militates against her primary task of evangelism” (pp. 318-319).

“The Christian message is primarily concerned to produce Christians. It preaches its Gospel, it convicts men of sin, it calls them to Jesus’ blood, it brings them to the Word by which they can be born again by the power of the Spirit, it changes men… As the church does that, she is indirectly doing something else; she is obviously influencing the whole personality of such people – their mind, their thinking, their understanding. And the moment that beings to happen to men they begin to see things in a different way and they begin to apply their thinking to daily living” (p. 326).

“The tragedy today is that while the church is talking about these particular problems and dealing directly with politics and economics and social conditions, no Christians are being produced, and the conditions are worsening and the problems are mounting. It is as the church produces Christians that she changes the conditions; but always indirectly” (p. 328).

“The church cannot change conditions; and she is not meant to change conditions. And the moment she tries to do so she is in various ways shutting the door of evangelistic opportunity. If I attack Communism, the Communists are immediately on the defensive, and are not going to listen to my Gospel; they will not even give it a hearing. I must avoid that. I must not launch a direct attack on any of these things, whatever they may be. My concern is a preacher of the Gospel is with the souls of men, my business is to produce Christians; and the larger number of Christians the greater will be the volume of Christian thinking. It is the business of individual Christians to enter Parliament, as Wilberforce did... It is because there are so few Christians in the world today that ungodliness prevails" (p. 329).

I think that Lloyd-Jones has a strong word (at least for me) today. I must not be ashamed of the gospel. It is the power of God. I need to witness. I need to witness more. I need to witness more boldly. As I evangelize and help to plant evangelistic churches, then NE Ohio may change.

“Lord, help me be a missionary cleverly disguised as a pastor who looks for opportunities to have Gospel conversations every day. Give me the grace to be one who regularly invites people to new life in Christ. Help me go to heaven and take as many people with me as I possibly can! Burden me to actually make disciples – to lead people to Jesus in one-on-one conversations. And bless my brothers in Christ with a burden to win the lost, to seize many opportunities to point people to Jesus, and to be bold as a faithful witness. Let me not be nearly as concerned with having an influence in society as I am with having an impact on souls. Make it so, in Jesus’ name, Amen!”

No comments:

Post a Comment